Long-Time Participants Still Set Pace for Great Race
RT Lowers Eligibility Age for Free Service
Malts, Burgers and Hot Rods Come Together in West Sac
Lloyd Thaxtons 60s Dance Show Kept Teens Bopping
Senior Thoughts:
Cross-Country Trip Takes a Stormy Twist Part Two
Photo Feature:
Sacramento Then & Now
Expressions:
Your Thoughts
This Week's Columnists
Web Site of the Week
TV Courtroom Shows Proliferate in the Late 1950s
This
is the fourth in a series of 55-Plus columns on courtroom reality
shows. To read the previous columns on the subject, click
here.
In the aftermath of the unexpected commercial success of Traffic Court
which started out June 7, 1957 as a local public affairs program
in Los Angeles starring then-Judge (later Attorney General) Evelle J. Younger
other shows featuring simulated courtroom proceedings were added
one by one to television schedules.
Newsweek reported on Jan. 12, 1959:
In the past year and a half, since Station KABC-TVs pioneering
Traffic Court first appeared, more than half a dozen new, documentary-type
courtroom shows have gone on the air in California and several, via the
networks and syndication, around the nation. In the next two weeks two more
will have their debuts.
Edgar Allan Jones Jr., who succeeded Younger as the judge on Traffic
Court, was quoted in a Nov. 11, 1958 UPI story as remarking:
Were involved in a court cycle, and Im confident it will
last as long as the westerns, maybe longer. Theyll go on because theyre
realistic and dont ham it up.
From the late 1950s through the early 1960s, courtroom dramatizations did
enjoy popularity. A resurgence of courtroom shows later featured a twist:
actual cases were decided in simulated courtroom settings in the form of
binding arbitration. That started in 1981 with former Los Angeles Superior
Court Judge Joseph Wapner, presiding over Peoples Court.
Confining attention to shows inspired by Traffic Court
.
Traffic Court, itself, is the logical place to
start. It went onto ABCs network roster, as a weekly show, June 18,
1958. Day in Court, a five-day-a-week production with
Jones presiding Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays over both civil and criminal
cases (alternating with actor William Gwinn, who handled domestic relations
cases), started Oct. 13, 1958 on ABC. A weekly nighttime version, Accused,
starring Jones, was launched Dec. 10, 1958 on the same network. The popularity
of Day in Court was such that a spinoff, Morning Court
was launched Oct. 10, 1960 on ABC, seen Mondays through Fridays, featuring
Gwinn, with Los Angeles school board member Georgianna Hardy as the alternating
jurist.
The Verdict Is Yours was a daytime courtroom show aired
by CBS. It began Sept. 2, 1957, well ahead of Day in Court.
Unscripted, it featured actual lawyers playing the lawyers and judges. Unlike
the ABC shows, real cases were not used. Sportscaster Jim McCay was the
original reporter providing commentary on the trials. He was
succeeded in 1960 by newsman Bill Stout. The program aired weekly on CBS
nighttime schedule in the summer of 1958. As on They Stand Accused
which CBS broadcast weekly from Jan. 18, 1949 through May of that
year (with the program then bouncing to Du Mont) members of the audience
served as the jury, rendering verdicts.
Divorce Court was hatched in Los Angeles in 1958,
syndicated nationally on the new medium of videotape. The show outlasted
other courtroom programs that began in that era, remaining on the air until
1969. Actual members of the State Bar performed as lawyers. This show was
distinctive; to some, it was bold, others saw it as raunchy. It dealt frequently
with adultery, a subject that had been strictly taboo in earlier days of
television and which, on rare occasions when alluded to on the networks
in the late 1950s, was treated gingerly if not obliquely. By contrast, heres
the May 7, 1958 TV Radio-Life listing for Divorce Court: A
wealthy widow brings divorce action against her handsome young husband charging
infidelity. Jones commented in an interview that Divorce Court
contained an awful lot of salacious stuff. He blamed that show
for the effort by the Los Angeles County Bar Association (which failed)
to persuade the State Bar to prohibit lawyers from appearing on TV courtroom
dramatizations. One proclamation from that association blasted Divorce
Court because of the nature of this program, with its particular
stress upon dramatic situations involving sex and crime. It said that
any connection with the program in which an attorney plays a dramatic
role, markedly lowers the dignity of the profession and positively debases
the administration of justice.
Peoples Court of Small Claims was on the
air in 1959, syndicated nationally. Portraying the judge was USC Law Professor
Orrin B. Evans (who became dean in 1963). Evans presided over simulated
small claims proceedings three cases in each half-hour session
in a subdued manner. Son David R. Evans, an attorney, said his father would
be appalled at the current unrestrained conduct of judges
on courtroom TV shows. Asked to compare his fathers show to Judge
Judy, he responded, simply: Different planets. This show
was commonly referred to as Peoples Court; indeed, ads
had the words PEOPLES COURT in large type and the balance
of the title in small type. However, Peoples Court starring
Wapner was not a reprisal of the 1959 show. In fact, Stu Billett, executive
producer of the 1981-93 Peoples Court (and the two later
versions of it) recently told me he had not known of that series before
I asked him whether he had drawn any inspiration from it.
After Divorce Court left the air in 1969, there were no simulated
court proceedings on television. Then, after Wapners show hit the
airwaves in 1981, there was, quick on the heels, a parade of imitations.
It is inevitable that when the current series dwindle to a mere few or to
none, there will, at some point, be another resurgence. Actual court proceedings
have been a form of entertainment from the earliest times in America, going
back to colonial times, when spectators filled the seats in courtrooms;
so was it before that in England, and doubtlessly across the globe.
During periods when TV courtroom shows are out of vogue, their comeback
will always be just ahead.
The
"55-Plus" column is written especially for those over the age of
55, by a veteran California journalist who is himself eligible for the club.
Roger M. Grace has written and edited newspapers for more than four decades,
and has been a lawyer for more than three.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||