After Setback, 100-Year-Old Candidate Begins Write-In Campaign

Daytime Thieves Targeting Local Seniors, Police Warn

County Aging Commission Cancels Meeting, Seeks New Commissioners

Protesting Possible Cuts at the State Department of Veterans Affairs

State Fair Has Days for Seniors, Memorial for Vets

Organizations Seek More Volunteer Help as Budgets Shrink

Letters to the Editor

Photo Feature: Sacramento Then & Now

Spectrum Expressions:
Your Thoughts


This Week's Columnists

Web Site of the Week

SENIOR LINKS




HOME
E-mail Roger M. Grace

Surly Ex-Police Officer Presides on TV’s ‘Superior Court’

This is the 11th in a series of “55-Plus” columns on courtroom reality shows. To read the previous columns on the subject, click here.

B“Superior Court” was one of a number of courtroom shows that went on the air in the 1980s with hope on the part of the producers that the success of “The People’s Court” would be duplicated. It wasn’t, in any instance.

That hope seemed realistic with respect to “Superior Court” for a simple reason. It, like the ratings-winner that inspired the imitators, was a production of Stu Billett and Ralph Edwards.

But while “The People’s Court” was like a child to Billett, “Superior Court” was more of a stepchild.

Unlike the show launched in 1981 with retired Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Joseph A. Wapner presiding, the new program wasn’t Billett’s idea, and he didn’t pick its initial star, former Beverly Hills Municipal Court Commissioner William D. Burns Jr.

Telepictures Corp. (now part of Warner Bros.) was syndicator of “The People’s Court.” It wanted to do a scripted courtroom show, like “Divorce Court,” and do it on its own. At the last minute, however, it brought Billett in and gave him the task of producing a pilot — virtually “overnight,” he noted.

There was a rush to get the pilot shot, Billett explained, because the National Association of Television Program Executives provided a forum in various cities each January at which producers could show their wares. Station managers would come to pick shows to place in their lineups the following fall. The NATPE exhibitions were close at hand.

Billett said he found a “spectacular” courtroom set which Paramount had assembled for a movie which it decided not to shoot, and was planning to dissemble. The producer said he acquired it and had it moved to the private studio nearby on Vine Street in Hollywood where “The People’s Court” was already being taped.

Burns already had been selected to play the judge. Scenes were hurriedly assembled. In one, Billett recounted, a purchaser of a home sued because he hadn’t been told that the previous owner died there of AIDS. The producer brought to mind:

“One of the lines was, ‘You can’t get AIDS from a home.’”

The show, depicting both civil and criminal proceedings, went on the air Sept. 16, 1986. Like “The People’s Court,” it was a half-hour program, broadcast five days a week.

The fact that “Superior Court” was scripted is seen by Billett as one of the reasons why it paled in comparison to “The People’s Court,” on which Wapner decided actual disputes (binding arbitrations in a court setting).

“‘People’s Court’ was real and ‘Superior Court’ was not,” he said.

Burns, who at that time was a neighbor of mine, was not someone I would have pegged as potential rival to Wapner. A former police officer, he was gruff and rough around the edges — though, as Billett recalled his countenance: “He kind of looked like Spencer Tracy, if you squinted in the dark.”

Burns was commonly referred to in the press as a “real judge,” through he hadn’t been. He was a commissioner (hired by the judges to perform judicial duties) for a period of about two and a half years, ending in 1981.

Billett said he doesn’t know how Burns came to be selected. However, the managing editor of the show, Harvey Levin (yes, the Harvey Levin seen through the years on “The People’s Court”), told me he thinks an executive of Telepictures encountered Burns when he appeared before him on a traffic ticket.

The show did feature “real cases,” in a sense. There were not on-air adjudications, as on “The People’s Court.” Indeed, it would be a bit difficult to use such an approach where the disputants were the state and alleged felons. Rather, as on “Divorce Court” and courtroom shows of earlier decades, fact situations were derived from actual cases.

“We went and found all these great cases,” Billett enthused, noting that they scoured Lexis. He termed the experience “more fun than anything I’d done.”

Levin (an attorney, now on inactive status) told me that “pitch meetings” were held at which decisions were made as to which cases made the grade. (It sounds like the Wednesday conferences of the California Supreme Court.) Levin said that spirited debates took place among him, Billett, writers Joyce Corrington and her husband (since deceased) John William Corrington, who had been a practicing attorney, and others.

“Superior Court” was “much more story driven” than “The People’s Court,” Levin said, which he termed “performer driven.”

The show lasted three seasons. There were 238 episodes.

Its moment of glory — actually, a week of glory — came in 1987 when guest judges included a former California chief justice, a sitting Court of Appeal presiding justice, and a judge of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. And there were daily comments from a member of the United States Supreme Court. More about that next week.

The "55-Plus" column is written especially for those over the age of 55, by a veteran California journalist who is himself eligible for the club. Roger M. Grace has written and edited newspapers for more than four decades, and has been a lawyer for more than three.




Senior Thoughts    Stan's Sacramento    Senior Focus

Humor    Around The World    Affairs of State



HOME

This page and its contents ©2003 Metropolitan News Company, Inc.
Last Updated 8/26/03
 
 
 

'