Spectrum Exclusive: Candidates Answer Senior Survey
Former Dave Clark Five Singer Returns After Long Absence
Seniors’ Education Program Has New Leader, Diverse Schedule
‘Universal
Health Care’ Bill Is Back on Legislative Docket
Photo
Feature: Sacramento Then & Now
Spectrum Expressions:
Your Thoughts
This Week's Columnists
Web Site of the Week
NEW: If you would like to order a copy of a Spectrum photo, CLICK HERE
‘OK, Mr. Justice, Camera’s Rolling; Scene One, Take One!’
This is the 13th in a series of 55-Plus columns on courtroom reality shows. To read the previous column on the subject, click here.
How
does a TV executive go about booking an appearance on a daytime TV
show by a U.S. Supreme Court justice?
That was the task Harvey Levin, who was managing editor of TV’s “Superior
Court,” assigned himself in connection with putting together a weeklong
tribute to the bicentenary of the U.S. Constitution, aired during the last week
of February, 1987. He lined up ousted California Chief Justice Rose Bird and
others to act as guest judges that week, and secured daily comments, on tape,
from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun.
Surely, Levin didn’t just phone Blackmun’s office and say:
“Hi, this is Harvey Levin. Listen, I’ve got an opening for a guest
spot on a TV show, and I was thinking of using the judge. How’s next Thursday
at 10 for him?”
Not a likely scenario. Even to this day, the Bashful Nine bar cameras at their
oral arguments, and 17 years ago they were even more standoffish than now when
it came to interviews.
So how did Levin swing it? Contacted at his production company where he was about
to tape an episode of “Celebrity Justice,” of which he’s executive
producer, Levin said he’s never told the story before.
He recounted that he boasted to Stu Billett, the executive producer of “Superior
Court,” that he would line up a Supreme Court justice to provide an introduction
to each of the daily episodes. Levin quoted Billett as scoffing:
“No you’re not. That’s crazy. You’re not going to get
anybody from the Supreme Court.”
Undaunted, Levin telephoned the office of Chief Justice Warren Burger. He recalled:
“His assistant just shot me down and said, ‘No — and nobody
on the Supreme Court will do it, so you can quit trying.’”
Quit trying? Nope.
Levin knew that Blackmun couldn’t stand the chief justice. So, he said,
he telephoned Blackmun’s assistant and told him what he was seeking, but
added:
“I’m sure that no one’s going to do this because the chief
justice said that.”
Levin explained: “I played Burger against Blackmun.”
The reverse psychology worked.
Soon after that, Levin was leading his camera crew through the corridors of the
Supreme Court Building — terrain on which few reporters with cameras had
trod — proceeding to the chambers of a high court jurist who was unavailable
to network news shows.
“It was a thrilling experience,” Levin remarked.
He acknowledged, however, “Harry Blackmun was terrible television.”
Levin said that when Billett viewed the tapes of the justice’s remarks,
he asked: “How can you come back with this?”
So blah were the jurist’s pontifications that what were intended as introductions
to each episode were bumped to the ends of the shows.
Nonetheless, Levin achieved what he was told was impossible, and brought prestige
to a syndicated show which he himself terms “a legal soap opera.”
Levin also had a formidable task in recruiting members and former members of
appellate courts to assume the roles of judges in a scripted court show.
Alarcon recounted the phone call in which he was asked to participate in one
of the shows honoring the Constitution. He said Levin’s team told him they
wanted “representative people.”
The judge commented:
“I knew what that meant. An Hispanic, a woman, and — who else was
there?”
There was the late Bernard Jefferson, a former Court of Appeal presiding justice,
who was black. Alarcon is Hispanic and there were three women: Court of Appeal
Presiding Justice Mildred Lillie and Bird (both deceased) and former Ninth Circuit
Judge Shirley Hufstedler.
The producers were trying to “make a point,” Alarcon said, the point
being that irrespective of gender or ethnic group, “you can be on a high
appellate court, if you have the merit.”
Alarcon said that “as it was presented,” he saw no ethical impediment
to his participating. “I don’t think it is appropriate for a judge
to be in a fictional portrayal of a court, ordinarily,” he noted, but explained
that this was a “commemorative kind of a program.”
The jurist said he recalls hearing no reactions to his performance, remarking: “I
don’t know if anybody saw it.”
(Hufstedler, secretary of education during the Carter administration, said she
has participated in various television programs through the years, and “they
all blur now” in her memory.)
More about “Superior Court” and other courtroom simulation shows
of that time period in next week’s column.
The "55-Plus" column is written especially for those over the age of 55, by a veteran California journalist who is himself eligible for the club. Roger M. Grace has written and edited newspapers for more than four decades, and has been a lawyer for more than three.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||