The
popular belief seems to be that California has been
gutting its health insurance program for the
poor because of the state budget problems. Budget
figures tell a much different story.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has proposed increasing Medi-Cal spending
next year, from the current $28.7 billion to $31.2 billion. Based on comments
made
by influential
lawmakers, the Legislature seems likely to add even more money to Medi-Cal’s
budget.
During the past decade, spending on the Medi-Cal program has gone through the
roof — from $16.5 billion in 1994 to $28.7 billion this year. During that
same period, the program’s caseload grew from 5.4 million people to 6.5
million, so the spending increase is equivalent to about $11,000 for each person
added to the rolls.
There have been only two years since 1994 in which Medi-Cal funding actually
fell compared to the previous year.
The first cut occurred in 1997-98, when Medi-Cal spent $18.3 billion, down $100
million from the prior year. The reduction made sense, since the program’s
caseload also decreased that year by 200,000 people.
The second cut was last year, when spending was reduced $400 million even as
the number of Medi-Cal recipients grew by 100,000.
These numbers are easier to follow when viewed in sequence:
1994-95 — $16.5 billion
1995-96 — $16.5 billion
1996-97 — $18.4 billion
1997-98 — $18.3 billion
1998-99 — $20.2 billion
1999-00 — $22.3 billion
2000-01 — $24.3 billion
2001-02 — $27.0 billion
2002-03 — $29.1 billion
2003-04 — $28.7 billion
2004-05 — $31.2 billion (proposed by the governor)
Clearly, the problem isn’t that the government has been stingy with its
money. In fact, a good argument could be made that past governors and state lawmakers
have been far too generous with Medi-Cal dollars.
Consider, for example, that Medi-Cal money pays for emergency treatment and prenatal
care for illegal aliens — people who would be deported before such needs
arise if this country’s immigration officials were doing their jobs.
According to census figures, there are about 2 million illegal aliens living
in California, a good many of whom are poor and therefore receive Medi-Cal coverage.
Actual figures are hard to come by, but it’s clear that Medi-Cal spends
a tidy sum on care for people who break the country’s citizenship laws.
State lawmakers also have made it easier for people to qualify for Medi-Cal even
if they aren’t poor. That’s right, the “safety net” medical
coverage for low-income residents also covers people who can afford to pay for
their own care.
With a good lawyer or financial planner, a person can qualify for Medi-Cal to
pay for nursing home care regardless of financial need. In a Q&A section
on one financial planner’s Web site, the question is posed, “How
much money can I have and still qualify for Medi-Cal?” The answer: “Usually
unlimited, however call our office for explanation.”
That could be considered hiding assets were it not for the fact that the government
has gone out of its way to accommodate such schemes. It’s not hiding if
nobody is seeking.
As this year’s budget debate heats up, keep all these facts and figures
in mind. Remember that Medi-Cal funding has been increasing for years, with no
significant cuts.
And remember that if serious reductions are proposed, the cuts don’t have
to result in the suffering of poor seniors. Instead, spending on illegal aliens
and the non-poor could be cut immediately, at a huge savings, if state officials
had the desire to do so.
David
Kline is a Sacramento native who has been writing about seniors' issues since
1991. He has served as Spectrum's editor for the past five years a
period that has seen the paper receive awards from the California Newspapers
Publishers' Association and National Mature Media Awards program.