Senior With Unusual Wartime Experience
Supports Veterans
Guide on Preventing Elder Abuse Released
by State, AARP
Assembly Speaker Appoints Two to State Commission on Aging
Volunteers of the Month: Ann and Rick Bruno
Travel: Choosing a Cruise Vacation Is a Breeze
Click Here
to Download Printable KCTC Senior Spectacular PDF
Expressions:
Your Thoughts
Web Site of the Week
Let it be said right here, at the beginning of this piece, that I
am not an economist. I don't know trickle down from eider down, market price
from Vincent Price or gross national product from gross national politics,
although I have seen a lot of the latter. I don't know anything about the
Law Of diminishing returns -- although I am familiar with Nordstrom's policy
on all returns.
Because of all that ignorance about economics, I am not bound by the economists'
compulsion to qualify each and every economic pronouncement. I can make statements
about our nation's economy without having to temper what I write by saying,
"On the other hand."
On the other hand, I do have powerful ideas on the nation's economy and propose
to state them here and now with the certainty and indisputability only the
ignorant can muster.
What you are about to read is the Larry Miller formula for bringing the United
States out of its present economic doldrums and into a new era of wealth and
prosperity. Out of its unemployment problems and into a time of achievement
and affluence for everyone. A time which will last not 10 years or 20 or 50
years, but as far into the future as mankind can conceive.
To understand the basis for this hypothesis, we must look to the past and
adapt the lessons learned from those times to the present and the future.
There was a time when the labor force worked 60, 70 and 80 hours a week. A
concomitant of that circumstance was that there was massive unemployment.
Those jobs which were available to the common man was filled by him 14 to
16 hours a day. Unemployment was rife.
Then came the eight-hour work day. The 40-hour work week. And suddenly twice
as many men were put to work to fill the same number of jobs.
Women were yet to enter the work force in any significant way, which was a
good thing because men were the breadwinners in those days and if women had
competed for the same jobs, who knows who would have brought home the bacon?
Or the bread, for that matter.
In time, Social Security came into being and people retired at 65, making
room for younger employees in the work force.
That worked well, because when men worked 60 to 80 hours a week, their jobs
killed them off. With a benign 40-hour week, men could have worked well into
their 80s and 90s. If that had been the case, where would the working woman
be today? At home taking care of the kids and their husbands.
And we wouldn't want that to be the case, would we?
By now, you have the general idea of where I am heading with this theory.
The fewer hours anyone works, the more work there is for more people.
Other contributions were made to the health of the economy when holidays were
declared and people got paid for not working on those days. But the potential
contributions of holidays to the national welfare have hardly been utilized.
There are holidays yet unthought of which should be made official so that
workers will get more days off at full salary, making more time available
for the unemployed to fill.
What follows are a few days and weeks officially designated by Congress or
the White House:
National Park Week will not only make friends of the environment happy, but
will provide seven days of work for new job seekers. Kraut and Frankfurters
Week will honor picnickers everywhere.
And let's not forget National Potato Lovers Month. Thirty more days of not
working in order to help the economy.
It seems that the less we work, the better off the nation is.
So let's begin with our elected officials. Let's make sure that there are
lots more days off for Congress and the folks who work in the West Wing. Then
we can get to state and local politicians. Wow! This is better than I thought
it was going to be.
Wait a minute. Forget what was said above. This is beginning to make sense,
and we can't have that as part of this theory, can we?.
Humor
columnist Larry Miller is a former television writer who has penned lines
for Dick Van Dyke, Ed McMahon, Jack Paar and many others, and for shows including
"The Dating Game," "Beat the Clock" and "Petticoat
Junction." In 1985, he began his weekly newspaper column on the lighter
side of getting older.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||