Last Updated 3/8/05



Brothers Bring Message of Travel, Reconnection and Bonding in New Memoir

Alison Krauss and Union Station Make Tour Stop in Berkeley

Aging Lifestyles: The Story of Maxwell, the Alley Cat

Stan's Sacramento: Holiday Gift Provides Ongoing Hot Stove League Enjoyment

Senior Beat: At 95, Local Barber Has No Intention of Retirings

This Week's Columnists

Spectrum Expressions:
Your Thoughts


Web Site of the Week

SENIOR LINKS

If you would like to order a copy of a Spectrum photo, CLICK HERE

The White House Smear Campaign Continues

President Bush doesn’t seem to have the capacity for positive change and growth. He has some well-worn dirty tricks in his political campaign bag and keeps forever using them.

In the past, when faced with a rival like John McCain in a presidential race, Bush deviously arranged to have him slandered. Then came the John Kerry campaign challenge, and, surreptitiously, Bush relied on a lobbying group, USA Next, to grossly dirty up Kerry’s medal-awarded military record.

Now, with the Bush Social Security privatizing campaign experiencing deep trouble, the president, in seeming desperation, is again relying on dirty tricks.

This time he is again being helped by the USA Next lobbying group, and the party to be dirtied up is AARP. This is because AARP has come out so strongly against the president’s plan to privatize Social Security. The trick this time is to paint AARP as being in favor of gay marriages and not Social Security. And, even worse, they’re blaming AARP as being against the military because AARP doesn’t campaign for military benefits.

While Mr. Bush’s hand in this dirtying up AARP is not visible, and the president is protecting his “deniability” by not being directly an instigator of the anti-AARP campaign - neither has the president made any move to condemn this underhanded campaign, thus giving his tacit support.

In fact, the smearing campaign on AARP promises to be so vicious that the White House would have real trouble in directly being associated with such a campaign. USA Next told the press, “We know the people at the White House agree with us and we agree with them.”

In explaining their organization, USA Next said they are underwritten by millions of dollars from wealthy donors and business associates the include food, nutrition, energy and drug companies. In the past, they supported the election of congressional Republicans. For example, in 2002, they campaigned for Republicans relying on monies from the pharmaceutical industry, spending $9 million. The Democrats, at that time, charged that this was an undercover operation of the big drug companies. In 2003 and 2004, USA Next spent $20 million, and last year alone, sponsored 19,800 TV and radio ads.

This business front group now says it plans to spend as much as $10 million on commercials and other means to dirty up AARP, except they don’t call it “dirtying up,” but “challenging” instead. They’re trying to do this by painting AARP as a “liberal” organization out of step with the more than 37 percent of AARP members who identify themselves as Republicans. They call AARP “bureaucratic” and “out of touch.”

In no way do they honestly address the real issue, which is Bush’s wild privatization scheme for Social Security, a scheme of inducing the under-55 to gamble on the stock market’s ups and downs for their retirement income security. By their smearing campaign against AARP, they are attempting to smokescreen away any honest discussion of the merits and dangers inhering in privatization.

We oldsters will not be taken in by this diversionary clap trap, no matter how exaggerated claims are made against AARP. The president’s silent acquiescent speaks volumes.


Ted Ruhig is well-known in Sacramento for his tireless advocacy for proposals designed to help seniors live long, happy, full lives. He has held leadership roles in several advocacy groups and on government advisory boards. Ruhig once sued the California Department of Aging for age discrimination, and won!

 

 

 

 

 

TOP | HOME

This page and its contents ©2005 Metropolitan News Company, Inc