Spectrum Exclusive: Candidates Answer Senior Survey
Barber, 93, Has No Desire to Cut Career Short
Question on Services for Seniors Among Those Chosen for Debate
Health Officer: Flu Vaccine Should Cover All of County’s Seniors
Legislature Passes
Bill Requiring Many Companies to Provide Insurance
Appreciation: Redemption
Songs Tell Life Story of the Man in Black
Former Dave Clark Five Singer Hospitalized After Fall
Spectrum Wins Award For Special Section
55-Plus: Rusty
Burrell: a Bailiff in Three Courtroom Series
Photo
Feature: Sacramento Then & Now
Spectrum Expressions:
Your Thoughts
This Week's Columnists
Web Site of the Week
NEW: If you would like to order a copy of a Spectrum photo, CLICK HERE
Around
400 years ago, around Willie Shakespeare’s time, life was short — around
50 years, with luck. A full life, by Shakespeare’s reckoning,
was adjudged to consist of seven stages, the seventh and last of which
was seen as inexorably beset with “childishness and mere oblivion — sans
teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything.”
With the rolling on of the years, by the 1800s, with much greater life expectancies,
French author Victor Hugo was able to observe, “Forty is the old age of
youth, fifty the youth of old age.”
Now, another 200 years later, with average life expectancies still lengthening — the
average length of life is now 80 years — science is engaged in intensive
research to further extend the average life span.
The ancient search for the mythical Fountain of Youth is still an ongoing project,
only now the search is led by the scientific field of aging genetics rather than
by the Spanish conquistadors of yore. And the scientists have their aim on genes — believing
there lies the answer to longevity.
From a scientific evolutionary view, it has been held that the only criterion
for evolutionary success is the reproduction of the species. Animals generally
die soon after reproduction, because extra life would not seem to lead to more
surviving offspring. Yet some species, like humankind, escape such early death
for a while because the adults, through post-reproductive care, help the offspring
to survive. Such survival activity is identified as the grandmother effect.
At the present, a new formulation is stirring the ranks of science. The New York
Times reports: “Biologists and demographers are greeting with considerable
enthusiasm a new theory of aging. The new theory was proposed by Dr. Ronald Lee,
a demographer at the University of California at Berkeley.”
Lee’s theory gives much greater weight to the nurturing grandmother effect,
claiming that this effect is operative throughout the entire life cycle. One
starts life as a receiver of help, but with age gradually becomes a giver of
help — a so-called transfer effect that goes with parenting.
Human kind is seen as a social species, one that strives for an optimum balance
between how may children to have and how much to invest in their upbringing.
This means that the rate of aging is controlled entirely by this parenting transfer
effect. That theory, it is then obvious, allows for a much greater possible extension
of the life span.
However, there is an observation that should be made at this point. According
to Shakespeare, life can be measured through seven stages. According to Dr. Lee,
life can be measure through two, maybe three stages: childhood (receiver of aid
through parents), parenthood (giver of aid to offspring) and grandparenthood
(continuing giver of aid to children and grandchildren). I would add a fourth
stage: old old — the receiver of aid from one’s offspring and social
aid from society.
It is the fourth stage that enters the picture with the extension of the life
span. A reversal of roles should take place here. The old old usually need help
from their children and from society.
This role reversal already is roiling society, and unfortunately it promises
only to intensify with time.
Ted
Ruhig is well-known in Sacramento for his tireless advocacy for proposals
designed to help seniors live long, happy, full lives. He has held leadership
roles in several advocacy groups and on government advisory boards. Ruhig
once sued the California Department of Aging for age discrimination, and won!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||