LampsPlus.com

1-800-PetMeds Fetch/120x600.gif

LampsPlus.com - America's Lighting Superstore!

Last updated 1/31/12



Del Oro Resource Center Provides Information, Support for Caregivers

Heartburn Relief for Seniors in Need

Alternative Therapies Can Help But Also Harm

Klockwork: Splying: The Blurred Line Between Honesty and Falsehood

This Week's Columnists

SENIOR LINKS

HOME

 

Ken's Corner
Ken’s Corner Mention Make Small Town News

By Ken Umbach

The December 20th Ken’s Corner mentioned the town of St. Paul, Nebraska, and the First Presbyterian Church at 816 Indian Street. A reader passed a copy of the column along to James Snow, currently a resident of St. Paul. Mr. Snow sent me an e-mail message in response, and it seems worth quoting. This is what he had to say:

“I recently received a copy of an article you wrote in the Dec. 20, 2011, Spectrum. It was sent by a friend and co-worker. I grew up in St. Paul, NE and in 2003, after 36 years working as an Air Traffic Controller (13 in Sacramento) moved back home. In the 1960s my dad was the pastor of the Presbyterian church mentioned in your article. The church building in the article burned and was replaced in 1904. It remains a great old building to this day.

“St. Paul hasn't grown much over the years as our newest count is 2,290. We are a farming community with a great school system, outstanding medical center, swimming pool and great parks. We also feel we are a friendly town and welcome visitors to our historical village, the Nebraska Major League Baseball Museum, and events held throughout the year. If you ever find yourself in our area please stop and say hello. I look forward to showing you around.

“Mayor Jim Snow.”

That answered a few questions, especially whether the church I saw in a satellite view on the Internet was the same as one on a picture postcard I also found online. No, alas, it is not, as a result of a fire more than a century ago, but it is in the same place.

I’ve never been to Nebraska, to the best of my recollection, unless the family passed through the state on the way to visit my grandparents in Michigan in the 1950s or early 1960s. Rosa has never been there either. It is tempting to go there and take Mayor Snow up on his offer of a tour. Since he worked here for years, I don’t imagine that a return offer to show him around Sacramento would have much attraction.

You might recall that my look at St. Paul started with a postcard mailed 130 years ago, purchased from a stamp dealer at the annual Sacramento philatelic show. It is a long way and a long time from the neatly crafted handwriting on that postcard, delivered by a carrier for the U.S. Post Office, to instant communication across a continent by e-mail. We are living in an amazing time.

•    •    •

I had a couple of items left over last week that I could not fit into the column. I’ll play “catch-up” with them this week. Both fall into the general category of “the more things change, the more they stay the same.” Or at least they show that some problems never seem to go away. Both are from the New York Times, January 24, 1912.

The first, from page 3, is headlined “GETS ALIMONY DODGER: Ex-Wife Meets Him in Subway and Has Him Locked Up.” It seems that Mrs. Elise S. Miller, age 30, hauled her husband, Alexander, age 36, before Magistrate Breen in the Men’s Night Court, in New York. She met up with him in a Subway train (yes, the Times capitalized Subway), “two and a half years after he had been ordered to pay her alimony pending a divorce.”

Mr. Miller became abusive during the encounter (he “used loud and profane language”), and that earned him arrest on a charge of disorderly conduct. Lacking $500 bail, he was hauled to a jail cell.

OK, unlike some surprising little stories of that era, this one did not make the front page. But still, page 3 of the New York Times for the arrest of a guy who stiffed his wife for alimony? (Now we mostly call it “spousal support.”) Be that as it may, I suspect that most Spectrum readers know someone who has had trouble collecting spousal support or child support. But how many of the “dodgers” went to jail for their failures in that regard? A lot of them might have become “loud and profane” when put on the spot, though.

The other story that caught my eye is headlined “WIVES EXPLAIN DEAR LIVING. Blame Trusts, Speculators, Husbands, and ‘Lame’ Laws.” The story, datelined Cincinnati, Ohio, January 23, 1912, reported on how the Cincinnati Housewives Co-Operative League, in the person of its President, Mrs. J. W. Ellms, advised the State of Ohio (specific office or agency not specified), regarding “the chief causes of the present exorbitant prices.”

Some of these reasons still ring true today: “Trusts [big corporations]. Selfish, greedy, and hungry for big profits. Speculation. Prices fixed by gamblers [presumably meaning commodities speculators] rather than by the cost of production. Husbands. Not as helpful in home management as they should be.” OUCH on that last one! Although I’d like to think I am not unhelpful, at least.

Mrs. Ellms went on, citing “Lame laws. Refusal to grant women the right to vote.” Well, at least that last item was rectified long ago, although it is not clear what contribution the vote for women has made to holding down prices.

“In tracing the high cost of living to husbands, Mrs. Ellms attributed it to their tendency to evade domestic tasks, and said: ‘Half of them don’t know the price of sugar or how long an incandescent light will last, and, all unknowingly, they greatly add to the already increased cost of living.’” She advised that both husband and wife “should keep household accounts ... and balance up and see if they agree.” She added, “I don’t know why a husband should not know when the flour is getting low as well as the wife.” Take THAT, gentlemen! Check those cupboards today!

Curiously, the article concluded, “Six women agents of the Bureau of Labor of the United States Department of Commerce and Labor are in Cincinnati secretly making an investigation of the high cost of living.” Well, they could not have been TOO secretive, as their activities were mentioned in the New York Times.

By the way, if you are keeping score, The Bureau of Labor long ago became its own cabinet-level Department, separate from the Department of Commerce.


Have a comment or a story to share? E-mail me at ken@umbachconsulting.com. or write in care of Spectrum. Really!

 



 

TOP | HOME

 

•    •     •

 

This page and its contents ©2012 Metropolitan News Company, Inc.